Counting quantifiers, subset surjective functions, and counting CSPs
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce a new type of closure operator on the set of relations, max-implementation, and its weaker analog max-quantification. Then we show that approximation reductions between counting constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are preserved by these two types of closure operators. Together with some previous results this means that the approximation complexity of counting CSPs is determined by partial clones of relations that additionally closed under these new types of closure operators. Galois correspondence of various kind have proved to been quite helpful in the study of the complexity of the CSP. While we were unable to identify a Galois correspondence for partial clones closed under max-implementation and maxquantification, we obtain such results for slightly different type of closure operators, k-existential quantification. This type of quantifiers are known as counting quantifiers in model theory, and often used to enhance first order logic languages. We characterize partial clones of relations closed under k-existential quantification as sets of relations invariant under a set of partial functions that satisfy the condition of k-subset surjectivity.
منابع مشابه
Galois correspondence for counting quantifiers
We introduce a new type of closure operator on the set of relations, max-implementation, and its weaker analog max-quantification. Then we show that approximation preserving reductions between counting constraint satisfaction problems (#CSPs) are preserved by these two types of closure operators. Together with some previous results this means that the approximation complexity of counting CSPs i...
متن کاملConstraint Satisfaction with Counting Quantifiers
We initiate the study of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) in the presence of counting quantifiers ∃ which assert the existence of at least j elements such that the ensuing property holds. These are natural variants of CSPs in the mould of quantified CSPs (QCSPs). Namely, ∃ := ∃ and ∃ := ∀ (for the domain of size n) We observe that a single counting quantifier ∃ strictly between ∃ and ∀ a...
متن کاملLog-supermodular functions, functional clones and counting CSPs
Motivated by a desire to understand the computational complexity of counting constraint satisfaction problems (counting CSPs), particularly the complexity of approximation, we study functional clones of functions on the Boolean domain, which are analogous to the familiar relational clones constituting Post’s lattice. One of these clones is the collection of log-supermodular (lsm) functions, whi...
متن کاملHomomorphisms are indeed a good basis for counting: Three fixed-template dichotomy theorems, for the price of one
Many natural combinatorial quantities can be expressed by counting the number of homomorphisms to a fixed relational structure. For example, the number of 3-colorings of an undirected graph $G$ is equal to the number of homomorphisms from $G$ to the $3$-clique. In this setup, the structure receiving the homomorphisms is often referred to as a template; we use the term template function to refer...
متن کاملConstraint Satisfaction with Counting Quantifiers 2
We study constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) in the presence of counting quantifiers ∃≥j, asserting the existence of j distinct witnesses for the variable in question. As a continuation of our previous (CSR 2012) paper [11], we focus on the complexity of undirected graph templates. As our main contribution, we settle the two principal open questions proposed in [11]. Firstly, we complete th...
متن کامل